Engaged by carrier’s defense counsel to analyze allegations of Insurance Bad Faith for carrier actions in revising Workers Compensation class codes to accurately assign payroll to NCCI class codes. Case required analysis of years of policyholder failing to apply payrolls accurately to NCCI class codes for audits and renewal policies. Attorney Frank Fox (602) 908-1707. Arizona Labor Force v. WCF National Insurance Company, Case No. CV2022-009615 In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, County of Maricopa.
Category: Workers Compensation
30
Aug2023
Engaged by carrier’s defense counsel to analyze claims handling of an Underinsured Motorist claim resulting from a low-speed accident. The claim was complicated by the policyholder’s son having his own Personal Auto Policy, reporting the injury 5 months after the accident, whether he was a household resident, and the possibility the injury was work related. Attorneys Philip Overcash and Tyler Milliron, Kutak Rock LLP (480) 429-5000. Wintrow v. USAA, Case No. CV2022-050974 In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, County of Maricopa.
August 30, 2023burld
28
Feb2023
Engaged by counsel for receiver/policyholder to evaluate Commercial General Liability and Pollution Liability relative to Insurance Bad Faith claims handling under 1980s policies with no pollution exclusions. The case was complicated by overlay of workers compensation coverage, contractual liability, and Reservations of Rights issues. Attorneys Brad Nes and Cullen Pick, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP (214) 466-4116. Standard Insulation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Civil Action No. 2022-CP-40-01241 In the Court of Common Pleas Fifth Judicial Circuit State of South Carolina, County of Richland.
February 28, 2023burld
30
Nov2022
Engaged by defense counsel as an insurance expert witness to evaluate whether a ship repairer had complied with vendor contract insurance requirements for Commercial General Liability. Dispute arose when a harbor patrol officer capsized an upgraded boat during sea trials, injuring several of the ship repairer’s employees, who eventually sued the City of Norfolk. Attorneys John Buford and Sara Bugbee, Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C. City of Norfolk Virginia v. Willard Marine, Case Nos. 2:17-cv-00109 and 2:17-cv-00110 In United States District Court For The Eastern District of Virginia.
November 30, 2022burld
08
Jan2022
Engaged by carrier counsel pursuing an Insurance Agent Errors & Omissions action for Bad Faith to recover claim payments made under a Workers Compensation policy underwritten based on agent’s material misrepresentations on the application. After a tree trimming worker was seriously injured it was discovered the agent had withheld critical underwriting information relative to eligible NCCI classifications and guidelines for the Workers Compensation program. Case required analysis of NCCI class codes and disparate answers provided on multiple Workers Compensation applications. Attorneys Brad Burns and Amanda Newman, Dickinson Wright, PLLC (602) 285-5000. FirstComp v. Ensign, Case No. CV2020-007001 In the Superior Court Of The State of Arizona In And For The County Of Maricopa.
January 8, 2022burld
30
Nov2021
Engaged by policyholder’s defense counsel to analyze whether carrier actions constituted Insurance Bad Faith relative to assigning improper Workers Compensation and Commercial General Liability class codes and processing inaccurate premium audits. Case required analysis of carrier’s failure to determine and apply correct NCCI class codes for 4 years of audits and renewals. These deficiencies resulted in significant lost business opportunities due to wildly inaccurate NCCI Experience Modifiers 50-220% higher than actual, erratic premiums accounting, and disputes over revised audits premiums. Attorneys Lindsay Wright Brett, Brendan Cook and Lola Ojeniyi, Baker & McKenzie (713) 427-5000. Zurich v. TxEx Energy, Case No. 4:20-cv-3622 In United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division.
November 30, 2021burld
01
Mar2019
Retained by carrier’s defense counsel to review allegations of Insurance Bad Faith Claims Handling for a Workers Compensation claim denial. Case required opinions regarding whether claim denial was reasonable, based on inconsistencies in employee’s version of how and where the injury occurred, and ceasing communications shortly after the alleged injury. Attorneys Paul Gerding and Andrew McNichol, Kutak Rock LLP (480) 429-5000; Ndwiga v. Plaza Insurance Company, Case No. 2:18-cv- 02324-SPL In United States District Court For The District of Arizona.
March 1, 2019burld
30
Aug2018
Retained by contractor’s defense counsel to review Commercial General Liability policy structure relative to insurance requirements listed in a Subcontract. Dispute involved Workers Compensation and a third party over action. Case required opinions regarding whether the Subcontractor’s policies complied with the Subcontract’s “Additional Insured” language. Moss v. J4 Development, Cause No. 2016DCV4519, In The 327th Judicial District Court of El Paso County, Texas. Attorney Jim Mounts, Ray McChristian & Jeans, PC (915) 832-7253
August 30, 2018burld
20
Oct2017
Retained by counsel for carrier seeking to rescind a Commercial General Liability policy based on agent’s failure to disclose material underwriting information on the application. Case required analysis of issues relative to Agents Errors & Omissions, Insurance Bad Faith Claims Handling and Workers Compensation issues involving an injured worker. Atlantic Casualty v. N&A Properties; Case 4:17-CV-368-A in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. Attorneys Camille Johnson and Steve Santayana, Savrick, Schumann, Johnson, McGarr, Kaminski & Shirley, LLP, (214) 368-1515.
October 20, 2017burld
21
Jul2017
Engaged by defense counsel to analyze Agent Errors & Omissions issues relative to whether the agent was provided a copy of an oil field services Master Services Agreement. Plaintiff had failed to provide the agent with accurate information to obtain Jones Act / USL&H Maritime Workers Compensation and/or Other States coverage. The dispute resulted from the Commercial General Liability carrier denial of a contractual liability indemnity claim (under the customer’s MSA) for an employee injury which occurred over water. Zadok v. Bell Insurance, Cause No. 2016-44757 In 80th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas. Attorneys Ryan Brown and Nathan Shackelford, Hermes Law, PC (214) 749-6800.
July 21, 2017burld