Commercial Umbrella (excess) Liability
Commercial Umbrella Liability (aka Excess Liability) claims
reach the Umbrella limits in only a small percent of liability claims.
However, once primary liability limits are exhausted these claims are
catastrophic. The dilemma is even worse when coverage is not properly
structured in advance. The "shock loss" nature of this coverage
often presupposes litigation, given that at least $1,000,000 of underlying
liability coverage is exhausted.
Problems include claim handling disputes between the primary liability
and Commercial Umbrella Liability carriers. Potential litigation
issues include follow form requirements, Impaired Aggregates, and non-compliance
with contractual insurance requirements. Failure to maintain required
underlying liability for General
Liability Insurance, Commercial
Auto Liability Insurance, Workers
Compensation. Pollution Liability has its own set of serious
coverage problems. We also bring you experience with excess umbrella
layers of liability above the first umbrella layer.
We understand policy structure technicalities of Commercial Umbrella
Liability Insurance policies. We also provide expertise regarding Personal Umbrella Insurance claim disputes.
We welcome a call to discuss your specific case issues: 817.980.4897.
Commercial Umbrella Expert Witness Cases
Cases are listed only after we are disclosed as an Insurance Expert to opposing counsel.
August 2010 - Engaged by contractor's attorney to analyze contractual liability claim denial under Products Liability Insurance. Case involves Agents Errors & Omissions, Surplus Lines, Commercial General Liability, and aspects of Insurance Bad Faith resulting from questionable Certificates of Insurance. Cause No. 2009-65915; High Tech Plumbing v. Colony Insurance Company, et al. In the 127th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. Attorney Kelly Prather, Greenwood Prather Law Firm, (713) 333-3200.
June 2009 – Designated by counsel for insured as Commercial Auto, Commercial Umbrella , and Agent Errors & Omissions expert. Case required analysis regarding failure to procure, non-owned autos, contractor’s liability, and additional insured endorsements. Allegations included Insurance Bad Faith. Attorney Charles Fairchild (816) 500-0280. MWR Contractors v. Becker Lassen Insurance Agency, Case No. 07BA-CV 01477 In Circuit Court of Boone County Missouri at Columbia.
June 2009 – Designated as Commercial Auto Insurance expert by counsel for policyholder. Case required expertise in Hired and Nonowned auto coverage, contractual liability, additional insureds and Commercial Umbrella policies. Pleadings involved issues of Agent Errors & Omissions and Insurance Bad Faith. Mick White Renovations v. Affordable Insurance Services, et al; Case No. K.S.A. Chapter 60, In District Court of Johnson County, Kansas. Attorney Charles Fairchild (816) 500-0280.
March 2009 – Retained by hospital’s in house general counsel to provide analysis of CCIP for a large hospital addition. Engagement included assessment of how and what coverage would be extended to the owner under a CCIP (Contractor Controlled Insurance Program) in contrast to an OCIP (Owner Controlled Insurance Program). Client requested evaluation of issues involving Commercial General Liability, Completed Operations, Commercial Umbrella, Inland Marine Builders Risk (including “soft costs”) and Workers Compensation. Attorney John McNey, General Counsel, Cook Children's Medical Center , (682)-885-1330.
September 2007 - Retained by plaintiff counsel to provide analysis regarding Agent Errors & Omissions & Risk Manager Standard of Care. Litigation resulted after denial of a large "Construction Defect (Contractors Rework/Rip & Tear)" claim under an OCIP (Owner Controlled Insurance Program). Claim was denied under Commercial General Liability and Commercial Umbrella Insurance. Roy Anderson Corporation v. Sawyer-Foster Insurance, et al; Circuit Court Harrison County Mississippi, First Judicial District, Case No. A2401-07-215. Attorneys Paul T. Benton & Tricia Beale (228) 432-0305.
September 2005 - Engaged to assist defense attorneys answering alleged Agent Errors & Omissions. A fireworks explosion and fire resulted in multiple fatalities and widespread property losses. Allegations involved coverage placement disputes for numerous lines of insurance: Commercial Auto, Workers Compensation, General Liability Insurance, Commercial Umbrella, and Property Insurance. Attorneys Brent Cooper and Joyce Ondich - Cooper & Scully, PC, (214) 712-9500. Joseph M. Lamb, Jr. d/b/a Pyrotechnics by Lamb v. Britton-Gallagher, et al; Civil Action No. 2-04CV-400, US District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.
March 2005 - Retained by plaintiff to provide forensic insurance analysis of coverage and premiums. Case involved issues of agent negligence over multiple policy years in placing Workers Compensation, Products Liability Insurance, Commercial Umbrella, and Property Insurance. Attorney - Craig Albert of Godwin Gruber Attorneys (214) 207-6901. Aurora Equipment v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.; Cause No. 04-07955-E; 101st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, TX
Return to Top
Burl Daniel, CPCU, CIC, CRM | 817.980.4897 |
burl@burldaniel.com
|
